Land Of the Dead
Horror / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Now that zombies have taken over the world, the living have built a walled-in city to keep the dead out. But all's not well where it's most safe, as a revolution plans to overthrow the city leadership, and the zombies are turning into more advanced creatures. Written by Anonymous
Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Feb 24, 2021 at 03:41 pm
Land Of the Dead 2005 Full Movie Download
Land Of the Dead TamilRockers Movie Download
Land Of the Dead HD Movie Download TamilRockers
Land Of the Dead Tamil Movie Tamilgun Download
Land Of the Dead Torrent Magnet Download
Land Of the Dead movie download isaimini
Land Of the Dead movie download moviesda
Land Of the Dead movie download movierockers
Certainly a blood fest
Simon Baker leads in this film as a mercenary who wants to head up North. Maybe the undead do not like the cold. He find himself trapped between various warring factions, including a ruthless CEO (Dennis Hopper) who offers safety to the wealthy while allowing the unwashed masses to fend for themselves, a fellow mercenary (John Leguizamo) who will sacrifice anyone to advance his own agenda, and hordes of zombies who are starting to take steps up the evolutionary ladder. They actually used a gun in this film. First time I've seen a zombie do more than eat. They even went in the water. Apes don't do that! Lots of blood, but there was less action than I've seen and more talking.
I love John Leguizamo, and that made it worth my time. Seeing Asia Argento (xXx) wasn't bad either.
Not bad, but not great
Land of the Dead - The 4th part of George A. Romero's zombie quadrillogy. It's been decades since the dead began to walk the Earth, and now they practically own it (except for Canada for some reason). There is one last little mega-city that is surrounded by electric fences, armed patrols and barbed wire on one side, and nothing but water on all other four sides, because the dead supposedly don't like water. Despite the fact that the surrounding lands are rife with zombies, this metropolis is incredibly corrupt. All thanks to evil bureaucrat Kaufman (Dennis Hooper, who I had a ball watching) who makes all but a select few rich folks (who have never seen or fought a real zombie) live in slums. There you can get your picture taken with zombies, or watch zombie fights (they fight over animals and the occasional human). There are a few mercenaries paid to make runs in a giant tank truck for precious commodities in the outside world.
Now I like George and could thank him endlessly for starting the zombie franchise, but he has always favored gore just a little more over character development, and has always liked his zombies just a LOT more than his humans. Heck in this movie, the zombies are practically the good-guys! They're just like you and me, except they rip people's arms in two (and I do mean length-wise) and tear belly button rings out of people. They are actually pretty intelligent and moderately fast at walking. By far the biggest threats in Romero's movies (most notably "Big Daddy" (Eugene Clark). For the most part though, it works, and it's good gory fun. Except the character development thingy. While I don't begrudge Romero for having fun with his zombies, I wasn't too sympathetic to Riley (Simon Baker) or Slack (Asia Argento). Riley, like Romero it seems, is just tired of character development as he has Riley say "I'm fed up with back-stories". But Riley dear boy, that's how the audience grows to care about you. Slack almost kills several of her fellow team-mates and does not grow at all, but that's the script's fault. Both of these characters, however are played well for what the actors are given.
Surprisingly the secondary characters are far more endearing. Cholo (John Leguizamo) was not only believable as a merc, but I was quite sympathetic to him as he realized that he was a pon. "Pilsbury" (Pedro Miguel Arce) and Charlie (Robert Joy) are endearing and funny.
So the effects are good. The story is iffy. The acting is good. The character development is iffy. The ending is really lame. This gets an overall B
Not a Horror Movie
I love horror movies. I love zombie horror including Dawn of the Dead. Night of the Living Dead was okay. Dawn of the Dead was so good because it introduced us to true zombie horror and gore and there has since been no comparisons. It's difficult to scare us now with cheap zombie gags. It's boring. Land of the Dead lacks true creativity. It should have been made over 10 years ago then maybe it would be more than just average. This movie is AN OUTDATED IDEA. It lacks today's suspense and horror. Sure it is a social commentary but this is Hollywood not a political rally. Romero used dated ideas with dated gags. We've seen more than zombies devour human flesh. In fact, the gore scenes should have been used to help with the scares. One thing that this movie lacked was character. When we watch good horror movies we can't help but jump when Jaime Lee Curtis jumps in Halloween. I don't remember any of the characters names or any particular character scene that stood out. Spoiler: The smart zombie should have had his moment in the end only. Instead he's rallying the troops throughout the movie...bad, bad, story because now he's no longer scary or intimidating. Spoiler: Whats with the line of zombie at the pier. Zombies don't get in a soldier style formation when only 1 of them can somewhat think. Spoiler: Too much smart zombies make no scary zombies. Spoiler: Why would Dennis Hopper depend on band of misfits to do work including run most important offensive/defensive weapon (truck) rather than the well trained, paramilitary dressed, soldiers. Spoiler: The movie would have been more entertaining with the misfits trying to save a sighed city than showing the ruin-the-zombie picnic scene in the end. Romero did stick to his slow moving zombie tradition. I personally think he should have stepped it up. If they can get smarter, then they can get faster. This would have elevated the suspense and chases dramatically. I believe Romero should have used a scare to surprise us with zombie developments rather than waste movie time to explain the story. OVERALL i rate it a 6 because i seen a lot worst and i can understand Romero's attempts, yet and still isn't this suppose to be a horror movie?
Read more IMDb reviews
Where's my car?
Most other comments seems to be infected by a classic case of -Let's read a plethora of theories and commentaries into this as an after-construction-kinda deal. It's easy to sum this movie up in one sentence: A violent story about a group of people in search for their missing car.
This has been praised as a stand against class-society and apparently it should contain a vast amount on social commentary. Where? Name one action movie who hasn't got a rich villain and a poor hero or some misfit trying to set things right based on his unbreakable social pathos.
And some of the huge plot holes:
Well the monatery system in this movie can't be explained. Why does currency still work in a world where there a so few people, and plenty of goods to go around for everybody.
The gated community is just a silly, awfully depicted place, instead of dealing with the situation they sit around drinking champagne and buying designer clothes. (Is this the huge social comment?!?)
Why build a stupid land train when you can loot every tank regiment on Earth?
After the three first (Night, Dawn and Day) Land... seems to be a world of it's own. It seems to be so far away from anything else, depicted in the first three, it could be a pilot for a TV-series.
Many may complain about the one dimensioned actors but, be fair, how would ANY actor act in such a humourless, wafer thin story like this. The direction seems more to be inspired by army boot camp than any sort film-making. It follows the same concept over and over and over again: "Run-Shoot-Swear-Run-Shoot-Swear" And by God do not under any circumstances show any emotion except anger.
I was almost breastfed with zombie movies and for almost 20 years it's been a great inspirational source. It pains me to see this movie and I hate to admit that not even me, one of the greatest fans on the genre, can protect Romero from this failure.
Mr. Romero, get back to the drawing board, and better luck next time.
I still have hope!